Brittany D. Mohr

Document ID: FAA-2007-0179-0002
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: December 11 2007, at 06:51 PM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: December 12 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: November 20 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: January 22 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 803780d0
View Document:

This is comment on Rule

Airworthiness Directives; Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited Model 206A, 206B, 206L, 206L-1, 206L-3, 206L-4, 222, 222B, 222U, 230, 407, 427, and 430 Helicopters

View Comment

After reading the proposed rule on Bell Helicopter, I believe that is not only right but mandate that this regulation be enforced. Under the grounds of 14 Codes of Federal Regulations Part 39 Bell Helicopter Model 206A, 206 b, 206L, 206L-1, 206L-3, 206L-4, 222, 222B, 222U, 230, 407, 427, 430 rotor blade are not airworthy. After the incidents that have taken place prior to the Emergency A.D. the cost of life outweighs the cost of changing the current rotor blades. FAA must change the primary rotor blades that have been too heavy that have had effected the control of the pilot on the helicopter.

Related Comments

Total: 1

Brittany D. Mohr
Public Submission Posted: 12/12/2007 ID: FAA-2007-0179-0002

Comment Period Closed
Jan 22,2008 11:59 PM ET