Neil S. Kaye

Document ID: FAA-2007-0378-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: January 08 2008, at 02:09 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 8 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: January 3 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: March 3 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80396f78
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Two complaints with the newest regulation: 1. It is unrealistic and an unnecessary burden to have the owner/operator make an entry into the maintenance log before each flight. I have no problem with doing the inspection; pilots already do that because contrary to what the FAA may think, most of us don't want to die, especially due to mechanical failure. However, we also don't want to be crushed to death by our governments never ending love for excessive paperwork and documentation. 2. If this is a manufacturing problem, as it appears to be, the FAA should mandate that Robinson pay to replace the blades. This is called product liability, and Robinson should be held liable by the FAA, as it will surely be held liable by plaintiff lawyers if/when problems arise.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 31
William R. Clark
Public Submission    Posted: 01/08/2008     ID: FAA-2007-0378-0002

Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
Neil S. Kaye
Public Submission    Posted: 01/08/2008     ID: FAA-2007-0378-0003

Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous
Public Submission    Posted: 01/08/2008     ID: FAA-2007-0378-0004

Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
Thomas L. Dager
Public Submission    Posted: 01/09/2008     ID: FAA-2007-0378-0006

Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
Mike Rhodes
Public Submission    Posted: 01/09/2008     ID: FAA-2007-0378-0007

Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET