Two complaints with the newest regulation:
1. It is unrealistic and an unnecessary burden to have the owner/operator make an entry into the
maintenance log before each flight. I have no problem with doing the inspection; pilots already do
that because contrary to what the FAA may think, most of us don't want to die, especially due to
mechanical failure. However, we also don't want to be crushed to death by our governments never
ending love for excessive paperwork and documentation.
2. If this is a manufacturing problem, as it appears to be, the FAA should mandate that Robinson
pay to replace the blades. This is called product liability, and Robinson should be held liable by the
FAA, as it will surely be held liable by plaintiff lawyers if/when problems arise.
Neil S. Kaye
This is comment on Rule
Airworthiness Directives; Robinson Helicopter Company Models R22, R22 Alpha, R22 Beta, R22 Mariner, R44 and R44 II Helicopters
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 01/08/2008 ID: FAA-2007-0378-0002
Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/08/2008 ID: FAA-2007-0378-0003
Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/08/2008 ID: FAA-2007-0378-0004
Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/09/2008 ID: FAA-2007-0378-0006
Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/09/2008 ID: FAA-2007-0378-0007
Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET