While I applaud the intent to harmonize with CS-E (former JAR-E) here are some
comments and potential consequences:
a. Proposed 33.17(e) of this NPRM 08-01 could require an ELOS (or exemption)
to any non-fluid carrying control component that is not fire resistant but that has
been shown by test or analysis not to cause an hazardous conditions when
damaged by fire (such as graceful and sane engine shutdown). [N.B. Engine
Control System used to be defined in the original CS E-15(e)]
b. It is also noted that the shut-off means in 33.17(c) would not apply to the
engine shut-down or fuel shut-off means envisioned by 33.75(g)(2) as adopted by
Amdt 33-24 (and corresponding sections 23/25/27 and 29.1189).
c. Further, revisions to the current AC 33.17-1 would be required. The example in
section 2.(d)(i) of AMC to CS-E 130 and other parts of this AMC should be
declared acceptable by the FAA.
d. This NPRM has other subtle differences from CS-E in the area of mounts (CS-
E 130(h) is absent) and small piston engine oil sump.
Thank for your consideration.
Yves Cousineau ing.
Related Comments
Total: 5
Richard P. Fiesel Public SubmissionPosted: 02/25/2008
ID: FAA-2007-28503-0003
May 21,2008 11:59 PM ET
Timothy McCracken Public SubmissionPosted: 04/10/2008
ID: FAA-2007-28503-0004
Yves Cousineau
This is comment on Rule
Airworthiness Standards; Fire Protection
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 02/25/2008 ID: FAA-2007-28503-0003
May 21,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/10/2008 ID: FAA-2007-28503-0004
May 21,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/16/2008 ID: FAA-2007-28503-0005
May 21,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/22/2008 ID: FAA-2007-28503-0006
May 21,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 09/09/2008 ID: FAA-2007-28503-0008
May 21,2008 11:59 PM ET