Ryszard J. Zadow

Document ID: FAA-2007-29305-0101
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: February 26 2008, at 06:57 PM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: February 27 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 5 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: March 3 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 803c8b64
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I am against implementation of ADS-B and support NO Action to implement this system! This system would be extremely costly to implement and provide little to no benefit to general aviation users. The installation of the required equipment might even exceed the market value of some of the aircraft that would be required to have it. The Capstone project showed there are benefits for flying in Alaska, but flying in the lower 48 is much different and there has been no data that there will be significant benefits to general aviation operators here. I repeat: I am against implementation of ADS-B and support NO Action to implement this system!

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 37
Nigel S. Free
Public Submission    Posted: 01/02/2008     ID: FAA-2007-29305-0050

Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
British Airways
Public Submission    Posted: 02/12/2008     ID: FAA-2007-29305-0058

Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
Nickolaus E. Leggett
Public Submission    Posted: 02/21/2008     ID: FAA-2007-29305-0067

Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
Herbert D. Rose
Public Submission    Posted: 02/21/2008     ID: FAA-2007-29305-0072

Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
Victor D. Raymond
Public Submission    Posted: 02/25/2008     ID: FAA-2007-29305-0083

Mar 03,2008 11:59 PM ET