Erenest A. Romero

Note: There is no Page 1 of 5 of the attachments. Text Comment #1: Boeing request the proposed changes to Note 1 be incorporated to clarify that revisions to MDC-02K9030 content is not required to reflect those operator iniated modifications, alterations, or repairs. Instead, such operator initiated modifications, alterations, or repairs are to be considered as deviations from the AWL content of MDC-02K9030 and should be approved via the Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC) process of the proposed Rules's paragraph (h). Text Commment #2: Boeing's proposed changes are intended to clarify that only operator proposed deviations from the CMM content require approval by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, or governing regulatory authority. The current NPRM text can be interpreted to mean that approval of a CMM in its entirety, including any future CMM revisions approved by Boeing, require direct approval by the Manager, Los angeles ACO , or governing regulatory authority. It should also be noted that MDC-02K9030 uses the word "deviation" in the same context as proposed above by Boeing.