The FAA is giving unwaranted favoritism to Taylorcraft Aviation of Brownsville,
Texas by requiring (short of an AMOC) in Compliance paragraphs (e)(3)(i)(ii) that
all repair schemes
be "obtained" from them. Repairs to welded tube steel airframes is a simple task
for many experienced IA's. Acceptable techniques are already given to us in
AC43.13, which is FAA approved for major repairs when determined by the user to
be appropriate, as in the case of a 1940's era aircraft.
The aircraft manufacture (when and while they still exist) is a good source for
repair procedures, but the FAA certainly shouldn't make them the only (by legal
regulation) source on simple aircraft.
The Compliance paragraph should read "(e)...do the following: (i) repair using
acceptable methods and practices." or something similar.
Furthermore, inspecting the attach fitting is already a requirement of an
annual/100hr. inspection as in FAR 43 appendix D, and cracks or corrosion in a
airframe is what any experienced IA is looking for, making this AD redundant.
Related Comments
Total: 5
Anonymous Public SubmissionPosted: 02/22/2008
ID: FAA-2008-0177-0003
James Zangger Public SubmissionPosted: 02/22/2008
ID: FAA-2008-0177-0004
Marc Fries
This is comment on Rule
Airworthiness Directives; Taylorcraft Models A, B, and F Series Airplanes
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 02/22/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0177-0003
Public Submission Posted: 02/22/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0177-0004
Public Submission Posted: 03/21/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0177-0012
Public Submission Posted: 03/04/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0177-0008
Public Submission Posted: 02/25/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0177-0005