Comment: FedEx Express Flight Operations and FedEx Engineering agree that
increasing flameout margin to buffer against possible core shedding of ice crystal
accretion is an important requirement, but strongly feel that part of the proposed
addition to the AFM Limitation requirements is of limited value, and may not be
justifiable. The proposed requirement for selection of Wing Anti-Ice would result in
a small or incremental increase in core temperature while increasing fuel flow and
unnecessarily exposing the aircraft to additional reliability risks.
While activation of the ENG IGN OVRD switch and the engine anti-ice system is
fully supported and believed to be an effective means of reducing flameouts, the
activation of the wing and tail anti-system is not believed to be nearly as effective.
FedEx notes that in the NTSB’s comments for this NPRM posted May 21, 2008,
no mention is made of the wing and tail anti-ice systems being part of the
successful recommendations on the Beechjet 400A aircraft. FedEx requests that
additional justification be made available to support this portion of the
recommendation due to the concerns that will be detailed further below.
Justifications:
Effectiveness vs. costs: FedEx believes that the total cost of this proposed rule
has either not been fully considered, or not been properly communicated. The
NPRM suggests an estimated fleet cost of $5,600 based on the labor required to
make the AFM change. What has not been factored in however is that the
selection of Wing and Tail Anti-Ice – while providing only a small incremental
increase in core temperature of the engine - increases fuel burn and exposes the
aircraft to additional aircraft reliability risks associated with increased use of this
system.
Per correspondence with Boeing, the increased fuel consumption due to Wing and
Tail Anti-Ice is estimated to be 40 pounds for a descent from FL 400 to landing.
Operation of the Wing and Tail Anti-ice relies on sensors, involves mechanical
movement of switches and valves, and puts thermal and pressure loads on
manifolds. Additional operations of these systems expose the aircraft system as
a whole to additional reliability risks and an increased possibility of operational
disruptions.
Historical Data: GE has documented 6 flameout flight events suspected due to ice
crystal accretion. GE Service Bulletin 73-21-07 ENGINE FUEL AND CONTROL -
Electronic Control Unit Introduction of Software Version 8.3.K (8322) was
introduced to improve flameout margin in ice crystal conditions. This change will
create new engine control configurations with enhanced VBVs scheduling logic for
inclement weather. The proposed software V 8.3.K will change the scheduling of
the VBVs at high altitude to increase ice extraction from the booster-core flowpath
transition to the fan exit stream and improve combustor flameout margin.
This software improvement is currently required to comply with Docket No. FAA-
2007-28319; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-27-AD; Amendment 39-15243; AD
2007-22-07. Incorporation in accordance with GE Service Bulletin is required at
next shop visit, overhaul, or within 60 months. As required, FedEx is upgrading to
this ECU software version. To our knowledge, there have been no suspected
flameout events using the combination of Engine Anti-Ice and ECU Software
Version 8.3.K on the MD-11 aircraft.
Alternate Proposal:
As a potential alternative, FedEx Express would like to recommend that the
proposed rule allow for different AFM requirements based on the FADEC
Electronic Control Unit (ECU) installed software version.
In plain terms:
a.) If the aircraft is installed with ECU Software Version 8.3.J or previous, follow
the AFM Limitations requirements as noted in proposed rule.
b.) If the aircraft is installed with ECU Software Version 8.3.K or subsequent, allow
for the following AFM Limitation requirements:
‘‘With ECU software version 8.3.K or subsequent:
Prior to reducing thrust for descent in
visible moisture when TAT is 6 °C and
below, the ENG IGN OVRD switch and the
ENG ANTI-ICE switches must be placed in the ON position.’’
Combination of procedural requirements and software: FedEx’s proposal
combines the actions of Engine Anti-Ice-ON and IGN-OVRD with the benefits of
the ECU version 8.3.K software upgrade. This proposed requirement
accomplishes the intent of increasing core temperature both procedurally and
separately via the ECU software.
Supporting Documentation:
Reference a.) Docket No. FAA-2007-28319; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-27-AD;
Amendment 39-15243; AD 2007-22-07
Reference b.) GE Service Bulletin 73-21-07 ENGINE FUEL AND CONTROL -
Electronic Control Unit Introduction of Software Version 8.3.K (8322)
Reference c.) Data sheets provided by Boeing regarding the history and event data
points for the flameouts suspected due to ice crystal accretion. These reports
were provided to FedEx Express by Boeing, and may be proprietary.
Reference d.) Estimates of increased fuel flow for Wing and Tail Anti-Ice descents.
For additional comments regarding this NPRM comment, please contact:
John McCormick
MD-11/MD-10 Fleet Tech Pilot
FedEx Flight Standards and Technical Support
(901) 224-5353
jtmccormickiii@fedex.com
Scott Rollen
Project Engineer
Powerplant Engineering
Air Operations
Office Tel: (901) 224-3843
Office Fax: (901) 224-3620
scott.rollen@fedex.com
FedEx Express Flight Operations and FedEx Engineering
This is comment on Rule
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and MD- 11F Airplanes Equipped With General Electric CF6-80C2 Series Engines
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 05/21/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0403-0003
May 22,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/21/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0403-0004
May 22,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/22/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0403-0005
May 22,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/22/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0403-0006
May 22,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/28/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0403-0008
May 22,2008 11:59 PM ET