David Wolf

Document ID: FAA-2008-0442-0002
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: May 16 2008, at 03:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: May 19 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: April 22 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: June 23 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 805d612a
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

1- Marking of the MRS, per para (c), would require the removal of the MRS as the flange is located inside of the MGB. This would require the removal of the MGB/MRH assembly and partial disassembly of the MGB, resulting in an extended period of A/C down time and lost revenue. Since a component history card is required, could an entry be made on it identifying the MRS as REL? 2- Note 2 after para (i) mentions the TS-281 marking but the MRS can have a TS- 281 marking but not have oversized dowel pin holes.This could result in a serviceable MRS being rejected. We had previously confirmed this thru correspondence with Mr. James Johnson, Sikorsky transmission dept, and Mr. Steve Graves, Quality Control, HSI. 3- We have had steel plates, reference SB 61B35-53A, on order from Sikorsky for over six months and have been recently advised that delivery may be in August 2008. We believe that consideration for complaince time should be given when replacement parts are not available.

Related Comments

   
Total: 4
David Wolf
Public Submission    Posted: 05/19/2008     ID: FAA-2008-0442-0002

Jun 23,2008 11:59 PM ET
Croman Corporation
Public Submission    Posted: 06/24/2008     ID: FAA-2008-0442-0003

Jun 23,2008 11:59 PM ET
Carson Helicopters, Inc.
Public Submission    Posted: 04/30/2009     ID: FAA-2008-0442-0005

Jun 23,2008 11:59 PM ET
Sikorsky
Public Submission    Posted: 11/02/2010     ID: FAA-2008-0442-0006

Jun 23,2008 11:59 PM ET