Carson Helicopters, Inc.

Document ID: FAA-2008-0442-0005
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: April 30 2009, at 02:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: April 30 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: April 22 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: June 23 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8096fb5c
View Document:

This is comment on Rule

Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S- 61A, D, E, L, N, NM, R, and V; Croman Corporation Model SH-3H, Carson Helicopters, Inc. Model S-61L; Glacier Helicopter Model CH-3E; Robinson AirCrane, Inc. Model CH-3E, CH-3C, HH-3C and HH-3E; and Siller Helicopters Model CH-3E and SH-3A Helicopters

View Comment

There is a difference between this proposed AD and AD 98-26-02 in how many lifts consititute the shaft being REL. In 98-26-02 para (a), the second sentance states that REL is when the average number equals or exceeds 6 lifts per hour, while in the proposed AD para (b) (1) (i) requires more than 6 lifts per hour to be in REL. That could mean that a shaft that had a maximum of 6 lifts per hour and is REL under 98-26-02, would not be considered REL under this AD.

Related Comments

Total: 4

David Wolf
Public Submission Posted: 05/19/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0442-0002

Comment Period Closed
Jun 23,2008 11:59 PM ET

Croman Corporation
Public Submission Posted: 06/24/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0442-0003

Comment Period Closed
Jun 23,2008 11:59 PM ET

Carson Helicopters, Inc.
Public Submission Posted: 04/30/2009 ID: FAA-2008-0442-0005

Comment Period Closed
Jun 23,2008 11:59 PM ET

Sikorsky
Public Submission Posted: 11/02/2010 ID: FAA-2008-0442-0006

Comment Period Closed
Jun 23,2008 11:59 PM ET