Michael Donahue

Document ID: FAA-2008-0545-0006
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: June 05 2009, at 10:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 8 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: June 30 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: June 17 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 809c6ee7
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

In reviewing this NPRM, it is written against the blade assembly. This will make this AD very difficult to track for an operator with a large fleet. Since the propeller is modular and blades can be moved around from assembly to assembly, the chance of missing an inspection becomes high. As an alternative, I suggest that the AD be written against the propeller assembly, at which time all four blades are inspected. This way, no tracking of individual blades is required and whichever four blades are in the assembly at the time of the inspection are inspected. Because the blades can move from prop to prop, a requirement to inspect all four blades at the time the propeller is assembled, "zero- ing out" the inspection, will prevent any blade in the assembly from exceeding its' inspection interval. This would be much easier to administer in the long run and make compliance easier. though I realize this is not the way the service bulletin is written.

Related Comments

   
Total: 1
Michael Donahue
Public Submission    Posted: 06/08/2009     ID: FAA-2008-0545-0006

Jun 17,2009 11:59 PM ET