In reviewing this NPRM, it is written against the blade assembly. This will make
this AD very difficult to track for an operator with a large fleet. Since the propeller
is modular and blades can be moved around from assembly to assembly, the
chance of missing an inspection becomes high.
As an alternative, I suggest that the AD be written against the propeller assembly,
at which time all four blades are inspected. This way, no tracking of individual
blades is required and whichever four blades are in the assembly at the time of the
inspection are inspected. Because the blades can move from prop to prop, a
requirement to inspect all four blades at the time the propeller is assembled, "zero-
ing out" the inspection, will prevent any blade in the assembly from exceeding its'
inspection interval.
This would be much easier to administer in the long run and make compliance
easier. though I realize this is not the way the service bulletin is written.
Related Comments
Total: 1
Michael Donahue Public SubmissionPosted: 06/08/2009
ID: FAA-2008-0545-0006
Michael Donahue
This is comment on Rule
Airworthiness Directives: Dowty Propellers Models R354/4-123-F/13, R354/4-123-F/20, R375/4-123-F/21, R389/4-123-F/25, et al.
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 06/08/2009 ID: FAA-2008-0545-0006
Jun 17,2009 11:59 PM ET