1. Note 3 following paragraph (l). The FAA should remove the reference to
Revision 1 of Technical News Letter (TNL) A23-3850-001 (Honeywell is currently at
Rev 6) and simply reference the "current revision". Based on the release of this
new AD, Honeywell plans to update the TNL with current information and try to
add some clarification on how to interpret the AD. Honeywell cannot release the
update until the new AD is released. In addition, we would also like to confirm
what the AD number will be so we can get to work on the revision to the TNL in
parallel.
2. The second is more of a question than a comment. Honeywell got a call from
an OEM late last week and they were concerned that many aircraft have been
inspected and verified to be compliant with AD 2006-22-05. Technically speaking
if the inspection was done correctly and the operator confirmed that both Service
Bulletins 7510100-34-0037 (Mod AS) and 7510100-34-A0035 (P/N Change) have
been complied with, they should not need to re-inspect the aircraft again. Is the
intent with this new AD to have everyone re-inspect their aircraft, even if they have
already complied with 2006-22-05 or can the FAA make a note under the
compliance section to advise operators who actually complied with AD 2006-22-05
and verified their radios have mod AS and the new P/N installed and then advise
that they were already compliant with the new AD?
Related Comments
Total: 3
Expressjet Airlines Public SubmissionPosted: 06/27/2008
ID: FAA-2008-0556-0004
Honeywell International Inc.
This is comment on Rule
Airworthiness Directives; Various Aircraft Equipped With Honeywell Primus II RNZ-850( )/-851(-) Integrated Navigation Units
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 06/27/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0556-0004
Jul 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/01/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0556-0005
Jul 03,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/26/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0556-0003
Jul 03,2008 11:59 PM ET