Japan Airlines

Document ID: FAA-2008-0619-0005
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: July 14 2008, at 02:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 14 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: June 6 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 21 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80671b80
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Dear Sirs JAL would like to propose the followings. 1. The NPRM states that AMM 28-22-00 and Boeing Task Card 4-28-007-05 are the approved method to comply with the AD. But both AMM 28-22-00 and Boeing Task Card 4-28-007-05 include two tasks. One is "Engine Fuel Suction Feed Test", and the other is "Engine Fuel Feed Lines/Couplings Vacuum Test". Two tasks are equivalent procedures and each one of them would satisfy the operational check requirement of this AD. Operators can make a selection from the two tasks. JAL requests the FAA to consider clarifying if the operator can choose one of the two tasks to comply with the AD. 2. The AMM 28-22-00 and Boeing Task Card 4-28-007-05 contain two tasks. To avoid misunderstanding of requirement, JAL requests the FAA to specify the exact AMM Task Number and Paragraph as examples for AD comliance. 3. Essentially, JAL believes this requirement should not be adressed as AD but CMR(Certification Maintenance Requirement) task. Regards, Takeo Asano Japan Airlines

Related Comments

   
Total: 4
Lufthansa Technik AG; FRA WE24
Public Submission    Posted: 06/19/2008     ID: FAA-2008-0619-0002

Jul 21,2008 11:59 PM ET
Boeing Commercial Airplane
Public Submission    Posted: 07/10/2008     ID: FAA-2008-0619-0004

Jul 21,2008 11:59 PM ET
Japan Airlines
Public Submission    Posted: 07/14/2008     ID: FAA-2008-0619-0005

Jul 21,2008 11:59 PM ET
Northwest Airlines, Inc.
Public Submission    Posted: 07/28/2008     ID: FAA-2008-0619-0006

Jul 21,2008 11:59 PM ET