Gentlemen and Ladies,
I am the operator of a Diamond DA42 Twin Star with Thielert Centurion 2.0
engines for which you issued an emergency AD to take effect 19 November 2008.
I am the founder of the Thielert Engine Owners' Group (THENOG) established in
the wake of the Thielert insolvency in Germany to represent owners of these
engines and the Centurion 1.7 engines and the chief executive of a startup air
taxi company, YourJet.
Since we have over one hundred members of our group, THENOG, who operate
nearly
200 of the 486 DA42's worldwide, we are directly connected and familiar with the
engine operating history of each of these nearly 200 engines. No one has
reported an engine shutdown caused by a failed clutch. No one.
It is our opinion that Thielert has been gaming the EASA system for their own
self-serving purposes creating a monopoly of supply for engine parts and repairs
to maintain cash flow for their ailing company so that they will be attractive
to a purchaser of the company. They have submitted several different mechanical
issues for these engines to EASA which resulted in "European AD's". In turn,
many owners had to spend thousands of dollars unexpectedly.
I would like to know on what basis the FAA has decided to follow suit with this
EASA directive.
It is very expensive to adhere to Thielert's Life Extension Program (LEP) since
they have withdrawn funding for it. To issue AD's to an already exhaustive and
expensive process is adding much insult to injury. Since their LEP is really a
continuing provisional certification program and not a warranty, safety of
flight should dictate that they cannot abandon their funding of the LEP program
without a concomitant voiding of their engines' certification.
This is the very core of the issue--certification of an engine that must be
inspected on 100 hour intervals until 1200 hours at which time it must be
discarded--it cannot even be overhauled! I recommend a moratorium on further
sale or operation of Thielert engines in the United States until an
investigation determines both how Thielert was able to get this unprecedented
engine certification from EASA and why they have been allowed to jeopardize the
flying public by abandoning funding of the ongoing process, the LEP, that
demonstrates the safety of their engines.
In addition, Thielert has not even made available enough parts to complete this
directive as clutches and kits are scarce and hard to find. There should be
more time granted to study this situation and to allow for more parts to be
manufactured.
Thank you,
Todd House
CEO
YourJet
502.693.2037
Related Comments
Total: 1
Louis Todd House Public SubmissionPosted: 11/25/2008
ID: FAA-2008-0841-0002
Louis Todd House
This is comment on Rule
Airworthiness Directives; Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH (TAE) Model TAE 125-02-99 Reciprocating Engines
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 11/25/2008 ID: FAA-2008-0841-0002
Dec 04,2008 11:59 PM ET