FedEx Express has conducted a review of our fleet and stock and determined that
we have a total of 19 10-14 Spool Shafts with the subject suspect part numbers in
our system. Of these, only 3 could not immediately be confirmed as having
previously complied with S/B 72-A1122. Additionally, FedEx has confirmed with
our primary Engine overhaul vendor that the ECI being mandated in the proposed
rule is already part of our routine maintenance program and any findings should be
subject to S/B warranty terms. Therefore, the proposed rule is not expected to
have any adverse effect on FedEx either operationally or financially.
FedEx finds, therefore, that we have no concerns with the content of the AD as
currently proposed by this NPRM. One minor note, however, is that it appears that
the estimated total cost to U.S. operators as stated in the NPRM ($594,500) is
the cost of a single spool replacement rather than the accumulated total of the
proposed action if the estimate of 10 affected units is accurate (though this may
be moot due to warranty considerations).
Scott T. Rollen
This is comment on Rule
Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company CF6-80C2 and CF6-80E1 Series Turbofan Engines
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 01/14/2009 ID: FAA-2008-1025-0003
Jan 26,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/27/2009 ID: FAA-2008-1025-0004
Jan 26,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/28/2008 ID: FAA-2008-1025-0002
Jan 26,2009 11:59 PM ET