Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Houston, TX
FAA–2008– 1046/Airspace Docket No. 08–ASW–21
It is my pleasure to comment on the Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace in
Houston, Texas.
As a rated Air Transport Pilot and Commuter Airline Captain, as well as
a Certified Flight Instructor, I have experience in various flight conditions and
airspace. In particular, I know the importance of class E airspace compared to
class G airspace with regard to safety, in particular. Here, it seems it would be
likely that class G airspace would become class E airspace. Class E airspace
affords a pilot with separation that is not generally provided in class G airspace. In
addition, there is a slight, albeit important difference in the distance a pilot has to
be from the clouds and the visibility required when on a Visual Flight Rules flight
plan. In class G airspace, during the day, at or below 1200 feet above the surface,
a pilot must maintain at least 1 statute mile of visibility, and remain merely clear of
clouds. At more than 1200 feet above the surface (and less than10,000 feet mean
sea level), a pilot must maintain 1 statute mile of visibility, as well as remain 500
feet below clouds, 1000 feet above clouds, and at least 2,000 feet horizontal from
clouds. Compared to class E airspace where a pilot (less than 10,000 feet mean
sea level) is required to have 3 statute miles of visibility, and remain 500 feet below
clouds, 1000 feet above clouds, and at least 2,000 feet horizontal clouds. My
experience has taught me that the additional 2 statute miles of visibility required in
class E airspace (in general) is crucial in seeing and avoiding other aircraft,
particularly when airspace is busy.
Moreover, adding additional class E airspace will surely increase the
safety with regard to the additional RNAV approaches at an airport. In addition to
the separation, my experience has taught me that the addition of an instrument
approach procedure, and particularly an RNAV approach, will certainly increase air
traffic. The stepped up requirements of Class E airspace would thus certainly
embrace safety as air traffic increases. Therefore, I am in favor of the proposed
addition of the class E airspace.
Related Comments
Total: 1
Sean L. Public SubmissionPosted: 11/24/2008
ID: FAA-2008-1046-0002
Sean L.
This is comment on Rule
Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Houston, TX
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 11/24/2008 ID: FAA-2008-1046-0002
Jan 02,2009 11:59 PM ET