Docket No. FAA-2008-1079; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-116-AD
FCU components undergo a functional check during unscheduled shop visits and
it is so noted on the shop work order for that component. The CMM requirements
have been revised to include an internal visual inspection of these units as part of
the SFAR88 requirements. Because of this revision, there is some question for
older units regarding their compliance to this proposed rule. Also, because of the
quantity of components requiring their initial functional checks, the lack of
available exchange or loaner units from Parker, and the shop turn time that is
averaging about 14 days, many aircraft will become AOG at the end of the grace
period (90 days after December 16, 2008).
My suggestion would be to allow for airlines to take credit for units that have
previously had the original functional check performed (grandfathered) and develop
a bridging program that will not be such a huge economic impact to airlines with a
large fleet. I believe that a following statement similar to the following, added to the
amended AD with regards to the FCU & VFCU, would not compromise safety and
would avoid a significant negative economic impact on carriers with large fleets of
EMB-145 aircraft:
“For units that have had a shop functional check without the internal visual
inspection, prior to December 16, 2008, a grace period of 180 days after the
December 16, 2006 is allowed. After the 180 day grace period, task 28-41-01-720-
001-A00 (28-41-04-720-001-A00 for the VFCU) must have been performed within
prior to the 10,000FH threshold or within the 10,000FH repeat interval”
Related Comments
Total: 5
Steve R. Reed Public SubmissionPosted: 10/31/2008
ID: FAA-2008-1079-0002
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET
Chautauqua Airlines Public SubmissionPosted: 11/20/2008
ID: FAA-2008-1079-0004
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET
Donald Neuhaus Public SubmissionPosted: 11/24/2008
ID: FAA-2008-1079-0005
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET
Donald Neuhaus Public SubmissionPosted: 11/24/2008
ID: FAA-2008-1079-0006
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET
Embraer Public SubmissionPosted: 11/24/2008
ID: FAA-2008-1079-0007
Steve R. Reed
This is comment on Rule
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model EMB-135ER, -135KE, -135KL, and -135LR Airplanes, and Model EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP Airplanes
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 10/31/2008 ID: FAA-2008-1079-0002
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/20/2008 ID: FAA-2008-1079-0004
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/24/2008 ID: FAA-2008-1079-0005
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/24/2008 ID: FAA-2008-1079-0006
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/24/2008 ID: FAA-2008-1079-0007
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET