eLaws | eCases | United States Code | Federal Courts |
Home » Rulemaking » Dean Mills

Dean Mills

Document ID: FAA-2008-1275-0005
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: January 20 2009, at 02:32 PM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 21 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 5 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: January 20 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80827dc5
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Step 1 of Paragraph 3.B. (Work Instructions) of Boeing SB 737-53A1269 states to “Get internal access to the Forward Airstair door cutout upper still web at STA 312 and the backup intercostals at STA 322.7 and STA 333.3. Open the Forward Airstair Door as given in 737-100/200 AMM 52-61-0 or 737-300/400/500 AMM 52- 61-00, or an approved equivalent procedure. Will alternate procedures be provided for aircraft which have had the airstair door deactivated per Boeing SB 737-52-1092? Will instructions for open and close of an airstair door developed by operators after deactivation per SB 737-52-1092 be considered “approved equivalent procedure(s)”?

Related Comments

   
Total: 2
The Boeing Company
Public Submission    Posted: 01/13/2009     ID: FAA-2008-1275-0004

Jan 20,2009 11:59 PM ET
Dean Mills
Public Submission    Posted: 01/21/2009     ID: FAA-2008-1275-0005

Jan 20,2009 11:59 PM ET