Alan Sheiness

Document ID: FAA-2009-0837-0008
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: September 16 2009, at 11:11 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: September 18 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: September 16 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: October 16 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80a24e74
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

(1) I think there needs to be a safe passage corridor for transit operations, from 800' to 1300' with different mandatory altitudes northbound and southbound; standard ingress/egress landmarks; a dedicated air-to-air, self-announce frequency; and a standard squawk code. This VFR corridor would be for aircraft that are simply transiting (or looking while they transit) but unable or not desiring the "new" Class B clearance (which I also strongly support). Pls ref LAX VFR corridor. (2) Below 800' should be a SFRA with mandatory training a la the DC SFRA, "special" or "authorized" operators only (doesn't mean helicopter or commercial, but it means you have had the special training). Since those aircraft down below 800' ARE going up and down, and circling things, and moving laterally--- they have a lot of position reports to make. Those position reports should be irrelevant to the transients above 800' who are following a standard track at a mandatory altitude. Their chatter could in fact impede the radio calls by those transients. So I'd at least re-consider a separate frequency for the special operations below 800'. As for the training or special operator designation, I'd use KPHL IFR approaches and the Grand Canyon as examples of what could be done. At PHL there is a higher bar to do the simultaneous ILS approach and Part 91 operators must self-certify that they have properly briefed. At the Grand Canyon, there are flyways for special operators and other airspace areas for everyone else. For the DC SFRA, we all have a little certificate on board the aircraft to demonstrate that we have taken the required training. I tried to attach a file for my full remarks; the BROWSE button did not function. These remarks are somewhat truncated owing to the 2000 character limit. Thank you. Alan Sheiness Commercial Pilot- Airplane ASEL, AMEL, Instrument Airplane 1300 total hours

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 91
Timothy Metzinger
Public Submission    Posted: 09/17/2009     ID: FAA-2009-0837-0003

Oct 16,2009 11:59 PM ET
James Harvey Bemiss Jr.
Public Submission    Posted: 09/17/2009     ID: FAA-2009-0837-0004

Oct 16,2009 11:59 PM ET
Phillip Potts
Public Submission    Posted: 09/17/2009     ID: FAA-2009-0837-0005

Oct 16,2009 11:59 PM ET
Daniel Cope
Public Submission    Posted: 09/18/2009     ID: FAA-2009-0837-0007

Oct 16,2009 11:59 PM ET
Alan Sheiness
Public Submission    Posted: 09/18/2009     ID: FAA-2009-0837-0008

Oct 16,2009 11:59 PM ET