Matt Gunsch

Document ID: FAA-2009-1015-0007
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: November 03 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: November 6 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: 
Comment Due Date: December 29 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80a4f8b8
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

The FAA is over reacting to a level that has never been seen before. They are asking for a inspection of 41,928 aircraft, or 83,856 control yoke assemblies, that span over 45 years of production, for a problem that has occured twice, with no disclosure of the date of manufacture of the parts that failed. My math tells me that is a failure rate of 0.0023850410227055905% Please note, that does not include any flight time just number of yokes and reported failures. I realize the FAA would like for aviation to be perfect, but it is not possiable, and a failure rate of 0.0023850410227055905% would be acceptable for any manufacturer, but to charge Piper aircraft owners $838,560 per failure is a indication that the FAA has lost touch with those they are supposed to serve. If the FAA is so set on issuing a AD to cover this issue, restrict it to the type and serial number ranges of the affected airframes.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 16
Art Zemon
Public Submission    Posted: 11/02/2009     ID: FAA-2009-1015-0002

Dec 29,2009 11:59 PM ET
Steven Barnes
Public Submission    Posted: 11/02/2009     ID: FAA-2009-1015-0004

Dec 29,2009 11:59 PM ET
Joseph Gawlikowski
Public Submission    Posted: 11/02/2009     ID: FAA-2009-1015-0005

Dec 29,2009 11:59 PM ET
Matt Gunsch
Public Submission    Posted: 11/06/2009     ID: FAA-2009-1015-0007

Dec 29,2009 11:59 PM ET
Thomas McIntosh
Public Submission    Posted: 11/09/2009     ID: FAA-2009-1015-0008

Dec 29,2009 11:59 PM ET