Paul Eenige

To whom this may concern: Prompted by an observation made by the FAA of a typographical error (wrong P/N) in the Applicability of EASA AD 2009-0221, which was kindly communicated to EASA on 23 June 2010, EASA revised the AD and republished this as AD 2009-0221R1 on 30 June 2010. However, in NPRM FAA-2010-1038, published in the Federal Register on 21 October 2010, paragraph (k) refers to the original EASA AD, and consequently contains a Note under the heading "FAA AD Differences", which states that “This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows: The applicability of the MCAI includes MLG part number (P/N) 41050–6, which is not an affected part. P/N 41060–6, however, is an affected part, and is included in the applicability of this AD”. May I suggest that for the Final Rule, reference is made to the revised EASA AD (the original is not valid anymore) and that the Note is amended to state “No differences”? Thank you for taking this comment into consideration.