Eugene Geylik

Document ID: FAA-2010-1160-0009
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: July 03 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 5 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 2 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: August 16 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 81079334
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

1) Paragraph (I) New Terminating Action must be optional, not mandatory. 2) We'd like the FAA to confirm that new repeat interval proposed by Boeing for the B767 model is based on sufficient evidence and supported by proper risk analyses. In other words, specifically for the B767 fleet type, Boeing has to produce adequate evidence to justify their proposal for such a drastic increase in inspection interval frequency.

Related Comments

   
Total: 5
Eugene Geylik
Public Submission    Posted: 07/05/2012     ID: FAA-2010-1160-0009

Aug 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
United Airlines
Public Submission    Posted: 08/08/2012     ID: FAA-2010-1160-0011

Aug 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
American Airlines
Public Submission    Posted: 08/10/2012     ID: FAA-2010-1160-0013

Aug 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
Boeing Commercial Airplane
Public Submission    Posted: 08/13/2012     ID: FAA-2010-1160-0014

Aug 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
Japan Airlines
Public Submission    Posted: 08/14/2012     ID: FAA-2010-1160-0015

Aug 16,2012 11:59 PM ET