Regarding the statement under “FAA’s Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD” of “We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type designs” ACSS feels it relevant to clarify that the operation of the Interference Limiting (IL) function that is in question was not the result of an error in implementation. The IL function was specifically implemented to operate as it does in order to comply with the requirements of the TSO Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) for Change 7 (i.e., TSO-C119b) as interpreted by ACSS. As such, the statement “…likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type designs” is misleading in that ACSS has already implemented the FAA directed change in all current and future versions (e.g., TSO-C119c; Change 7.1 compliant systems). ACSS would recommend that the wording be changed to: ”…exists in various ACSS TCAS systems.”
Aviation Communication & Surveillance Systems (ACSS)
This is comment on Rule
Airworthiness Directives: Various Aviation Communication and Surveillance Systems Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System Units
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 01/05/2011 ID: FAA-2010-1204-0002
Feb 11,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/05/2011 ID: FAA-2010-1204-0003
Feb 11,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/07/2011 ID: FAA-2010-1204-0004
Feb 11,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/13/2011 ID: FAA-2010-1204-0006
Feb 11,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/13/2011 ID: FAA-2010-1204-0007
Feb 11,2011 11:59 PM ET