Dear Sir,
please find below our comment refering to FAA AD 2011-22-03.
Paragraph (f) of the AD refers to initial inspection as per ASB AE3007A-A-72-386 considering that compliance with this SB is a one time comprehensive ECI and it relieves the operator of the repetitive inspection requirement of the AD.
Paragraph (g) reintroduce the reference ASB AE3007A-A-72-386 with a 5000 CSLI requirement which can lead to confusion as it is in contradiction with Paragraph (f). It is understood that the repetitive inspection is led by the compliance with ASB AE3007A-A-72-390 only.
We suggest to cancel the reference to ASB AE3007A-A-72-386 in paragraph (g) in order to remove possible confusion which could lead operator to call for an unecessary reinspection of engines within 5000 FC since previous SB AE3007A-A-72-386 compliance.
best regards
Related Comments
Total: 2
Francois Touchain Public SubmissionPosted: 11/21/2011
ID: FAA-2011-0273-0002
Francois Touchain
This is comment on Rule
Airworthiness Directives: Rolls-Royce Corp. Turbofan Engines
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 11/21/2011 ID: FAA-2011-0273-0002
Dec 19,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/14/2011 ID: FAA-2011-0273-0003
Dec 19,2011 11:59 PM ET