Rolls-Royce plc

Document ID: FAA-2011-0959-0002
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: December 07 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: December 7 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: November 25 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: January 24 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f7ceb4
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Rolls-Royce have issued 72-AG456 rev 1 which allows the boroscope inspection to be carried out from either side of the combustion liner for operator convenience and as a double check if there is any doubt about cracking or the length. The EASA AD Allows use of 72-AG456 rev 1, so can the FAA AD also allow this. Some US operators may already be carrying out this inspection and so believe they have a 2000 cycle re-inspection interval. Can the FAA AD give credit to operators who have already carried out the inspection with respect to the 1000 cycle initial inspection unless the “already done” paragraph (e) covers this. The EASA AD allows the 04 module to be boroscope inspected when it's removed from the engine but is not being stripped, so giving an opportunity to restart a 2000 cycle on-wing life before the next inspection or if cracked the opportunity to replace the FCL. Can the FAA AD also give this option ? The FAA AD requires the FCL to be boroscoped even if it is being stripped and can be visually and FPI inspected as part of the maintenance manual activities. This additional boroscope doesn’t seem necessary.

Related Comments

   
Total: 3
Boeing Commercial Airplane
Public Submission    Posted: 01/24/2012     ID: FAA-2011-0959-0004

Jan 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
American Airlines
Public Submission    Posted: 01/18/2012     ID: FAA-2011-0959-0003

Jan 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
Rolls-Royce plc
Public Submission    Posted: 12/07/2011     ID: FAA-2011-0959-0002

Jan 24,2012 11:59 PM ET