William Shrader

Document ID: FAA-2012-0045-0009
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: November 27 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: November 28 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: August 23 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: October 22 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jw-827u-7r15
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Paper Submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration Reference: Commercial Space Launch Act; 14 CFR III §400 ) ) ) W. Andrew Shrader ) wshrader@law.villanova.edu ) ) ) ) Prepared November 27, 2012 ) Support for Exclusion of Tethered Launches From Licensing Requirements Background I appreciate this opportunity to write in response to this proposed rule by the Federal Aviation Administration and their solicitation of comments from the public. I am a citizen with a a degree in the history of science and interest in the future of American space flight, and in the best way to leverage the manned and unmanned assets of NASA. In anticipation of the burgeoning field of private space launches, the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, empowered the Federal Aviation Administration, to oversee, license, and regulate commercial launch and reentry activities, and the operation of launch and reentry sites as carried out by U.S. citizens or within the United States.1 This was done with an eye towards regulating the hazardous potential of powerful, private rocket launches had for national security, the safety of American citizens, and to American property. In so doing the agency would mitigate the potential damage caused by extending space launches to the commercial sector, while positioning the United States to reap the benefits of a vibrant new industry by ensuring that such launches were conducted with care, responsibility and efficiency. The FAA was given this regulatory power with the direction that they regulate only the extent necessary to satisfy these safety and national security concerns.2 To go beyond that risks the future of an industry whose growth and success has exploded in importance to the interests of the United States now and in the future. Propelling craft and cargo into Earth’s orbit is an incredibly expensive venture, with the price tag to send a pound of material to the rel

Attachments:

William Shrader

Title:
William Shrader

View Attachment: View as format pdf View as format msw8

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 7
Nathan O'Konek
Public Submission    Posted: 10/23/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0045-0005

Oct 22,2012 11:59 PM ET
Robert Steinke
Public Submission    Posted: 10/23/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0045-0006

Oct 22,2012 11:59 PM ET
Alexander Salvato
Public Submission    Posted: 10/23/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0045-0007

Oct 22,2012 11:59 PM ET
Chad Thrasher
Public Submission    Posted: 11/27/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0045-0008

Oct 22,2012 11:59 PM ET
William Shrader
Public Submission    Posted: 11/28/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0045-0009

Oct 22,2012 11:59 PM ET