Robert Rusczyk

Document ID: FAA-2012-0275-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: March 22 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: March 23 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: March 20 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: May 4 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80fdd720
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

This is a rediculous waste of money. 6600 planes, one reported failure and one reported improper assembly. Most of this fleet is in excess of 20 years old with no reported failures. This should have been left as an SB with the exception of the very recent fleet related to the failure. A 10 hour compliance time on 20+ year old airframes is excessive. Next Annual or 50 hours would have been more reasonable. The FAA continues to take exagrerated, and unreasonable actions at costs that are not justified. There used to be a level of cooperation between the aircraft owner and FAA, but not anymore. The Lycoming Crankshaft AD was yet another example of excessive action with no measurable improvement at a high price to the aircraft owners. Many of these ADs appear to be "brokered" CYA between the FAA and aircraft manufacturers!

Related Comments

   
Total: 4
Gary Phillips
Public Submission    Posted: 03/23/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0275-0002

May 04,2012 11:59 PM ET
Robert Rusczyk
Public Submission    Posted: 03/23/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0275-0003

May 04,2012 11:59 PM ET
Daniel Bergeron
Public Submission    Posted: 10/31/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0275-0010

May 04,2012 11:59 PM ET
Paul Dorris
Public Submission    Posted: 03/23/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0275-0004

May 04,2012 11:59 PM ET