Ray L.

Document ID: FAA-2012-0433-0007
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: October 09 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: October 9 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: August 22 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: October 9 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jw-819s-u6o7
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

For the small amount of rotary wing traffic, and even less fixed wing Sherpa traffic, awarding Bryant AAF (which is just a few kilometers from Elmendorf AFB, a high performance fixed wing, heavy lift, rotory, and light GA aircraft Class D) another Class D Airspace designation doesn't make sense. I have lived near the corridor along the Glenn Highway/Fort Richardson for nearly a decade and can attest to the significant light GA traffic transitting the corridor and the very light traffic at Bryant. Such a plan would impact safety as any tower controller would be more preoccupied with the transitting aircraft requests than arriving and departing military operations. Please closely evaluate the need "and not desires" of a few Bryant AAF aircraft to have a lightly used Class D Airspace before you impact tens of thousands of other aircraft and their pilots. Please just do the research. As a retired naval aviator and Air Force flyer, is there a valid critical military requirement? Thanks...Ray

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 13
Dan Larson
Public Submission    Posted: 09/05/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0433-0002

Oct 09,2012 11:59 PM ET
Michael Ice
Public Submission    Posted: 10/04/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0433-0003

Oct 09,2012 11:59 PM ET
Jack King
Public Submission    Posted: 10/04/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0433-0004

Oct 09,2012 11:59 PM ET
William Granger
Public Submission    Posted: 10/05/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0433-0006

Oct 09,2012 11:59 PM ET
Lars Gleitsmann
Public Submission    Posted: 10/09/2012     ID: FAA-2012-0433-0008

Oct 09,2012 11:59 PM ET