Phillip Joseph Faillers

An airport has many uses. Any new ideas of use should be studied and honed to provide for that opportunity of use. This is the nature of positive change which improves access for those whom use its resources. Ask any aviation enthusiast and they’ll tell you if they’re not living on or near an airport now they hope to have the opportunity some day. It is an aspiration. Any change that does the opposite and restricts or stops people from their desired use is a negative change and thereby not an 'airport improvement.' I completely disagree with any change that restricts or removes “through-the-fence access” on any airport.