Anonymous

Document ID: FAA-2012-1105-0004
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: November 13 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: November 13 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 23 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 7 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jw-81xx-cxys
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Airworthiness Directives: Airbus Airplanes

View Comment

Where in the U.S. Constitution is Congress given the authority to to create such an airworthiness directive? Furthermore, what part of our constitution makes any airworthiness directive constitutional? The goal of such rules is safe flight, but will the federal government really make flying any safer? Government has a strong hand in road/driving safety, yet it is far more dangerous than flying. The safety of its customers is the top priorty of the flight industry. Therefore, the proposed government regulation would be nothing more than a waste of taxpayer money.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 6
Kirk Taylor
Public Submission    Posted: 10/24/2012     ID: FAA-2012-1105-0002

Dec 07,2012 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous
Public Submission    Posted: 11/13/2012     ID: FAA-2012-1105-0004

Dec 07,2012 11:59 PM ET
Air Line Pilots Association, International
Public Submission    Posted: 12/07/2012     ID: FAA-2012-1105-0005

Dec 07,2012 11:59 PM ET
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Public Submission    Posted: 12/07/2012     ID: FAA-2012-1105-0006

Dec 07,2012 11:59 PM ET
Airbus
Public Submission    Posted: 12/07/2012     ID: FAA-2012-1105-0007

Dec 07,2012 11:59 PM ET