Cody Welch

Document ID: FAA-2013-0190-0002
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: February 25 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: February 25 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: February 22 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: 
Tracking Number: 1jx-83un-lg77
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Rule

Charitable Medical Flights

View Comment

The existing exemption language while trying to raise the level of safety of FAR 91 VPO's and Pilots engaged in fuel reimbursement, has the unintended consequence of imposing Part 135-like requirements which make compliance extremely difficult thereby contradicting the intent of Congress. I suggest that the Air Care Alliance can provide industry leadership with straight forward suggestions as to raising the level, which everyone wants, while at the same time differentiating between Air Carrier and Volunteer flying. That line is blurred in the existing exemption language. While some VPO's may choose not to reimburse there are others for whom this is vital to their ability to sustain high levels of service to needy individuals in their communities. Finally, please make certain that those who do not wish to receive reimbursement are not bound by the same criteria as those who do. Thank you for your hard work in addressing this!

Related Comments

   
Total: 1
Cody Welch
Public Submission    Posted: 02/25/2013     ID: FAA-2013-0190-0002