Hi,
My research indicates that the correct listing for the optional FSS should be IDIQ FSS. Initially contracts awarded under the FSS were ID requirements contracts. As such these contracts became require sources for all items/services listed in that contract. The contracts were later revised to give contracting officers options in there purchases and were written as IDIQ type contracts. These contracts were then refered to as optional use FSS. If the FSS schedules were listed as IDIQ FSS instead of Optional FSS this would never have been an issue.
Clarifing the question as to whether or not the "optional FSS" is a required source as listed in FAR 8 would greatly serve the acquistion community. The question as to whether or not Optional FSS is a required manadatory source over open market creates a great deal of friction in my office.
My point is why go through the trouble and expense to fund an agency like GSA if there purpose is not given precedence. In addition contractors pay a premium to get on the FSS. GSA is much more efficient and less costly than going open market.
In addition GAO, REF Matter of: Edmond Computer Company; Edmond Scientific Company B-402863, B-402864
Comptroller General of the United States, has found that a contracting officer is well within their right to use GSA prior to going open market.
Thank you,
Bill Matini
Contracting Officer
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-14650
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Federal Acquisition Regulations: FAR Case 2009-024; Prioritizing Sources of Supplies and Services for Use by the Government
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 08/23/2011 ID: FAR-2011-0086-0002
Aug 15,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/23/2011 ID: FAR-2011-0086-0003
Aug 15,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/23/2011 ID: FAR-2011-0086-0004
Aug 15,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/23/2011 ID: FAR-2011-0086-0005
Aug 15,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/23/2011 ID: FAR-2011-0086-0006
Aug 15,2011 11:59 PM ET