Comment on FR Doc # 2011-20778

Document ID: FAR-2011-0087-0019
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Acquisition Regulation
Received Date: September 28 2011, at 07:53 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: August 22 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: August 16 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: September 29 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f3fdd3
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

The following is proposed under 42.1503(a) - 2nd and 3rd sentences - "Agency procedures shall identify and assign past performance evaluation roles and responsibilities to those individuals responsible for preparing interim and final performance evaluations (e.g., contracting officer representatives and program managers). If agency procedures do not specify the individuals responsible for past performance evaluation duties, the contracting officer will remain responsible for this function." Comment: The proposed 3rd sentence outlined above states that “the contracting officer will remain responsible” for past performance evaluation duties if agency procedures do not specify the individuals responsible. Where are past performance evaluation duties established in the FAR as the responsibility of the contracting officer to justify use of the term “remain?” The requiring activity/technical office that identifies the requirement is considered to be in the best position to evaluate contractor performance and thus should be held responsible for performance evaluation. Current DoD CPARs policy places responsibility for performance evaluation on program managers or the equivalent individual responsible for program, project, or task/job/delivery order execution. It is requested that the council consider revising the proposed sentence as follows: “If agency procedures do not specify the individuals responsible for past performance evaluation duties, the requiring activity/technical office remains responsible for this function.” Also, it is requested that the council consider defining “requiring activity/technical office.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 9
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-20778
Public Submission    Posted: 08/22/2012     ID: FAR-2011-0087-0017

Sep 29,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-20778
Public Submission    Posted: 08/22/2012     ID: FAR-2011-0087-0018

Sep 29,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-20778
Public Submission    Posted: 08/22/2012     ID: FAR-2011-0087-0019

Sep 29,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-20778
Public Submission    Posted: 08/22/2012     ID: FAR-2011-0087-0020

Sep 29,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-20778
Public Submission    Posted: 08/22/2012     ID: FAR-2011-0087-0021

Sep 29,2011 11:59 PM ET