Comment on FR Doc # 2012-21973

Document ID: FAR-2012-0009-0005
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Acquisition Regulation
Received Date: October 23 2012, at 06:05 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: November 9 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: September 6 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: November 5 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jw-81km-w1mr
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I write in support of the contractor performance rating requirements. A properly designed system of rating is of utmost utility for buyers and sellers who don't know each other. Two general comments: 1. I believe that the design should very strongly consider and utilize the features that have survived in rating systems seen on eBay and Amazon. This leverages the results of their many years of evolution and experience. 2. More specifically, a very important feature is the ability of the seller to able to post a response to all (particularly negative) reviews. As well as the buyer to be able to revise a hasty evalutation for example due to a extenuating explanation heretofore unknown to her.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 16
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-21973
Public Submission    Posted: 11/09/2012     ID: FAR-2012-0009-0002

Nov 05,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-21973
Public Submission    Posted: 11/09/2012     ID: FAR-2012-0009-0003

Nov 05,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-21973
Public Submission    Posted: 11/09/2012     ID: FAR-2012-0009-0004

Nov 05,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-21973
Public Submission    Posted: 11/09/2012     ID: FAR-2012-0009-0005

Nov 05,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-21973
Public Submission    Posted: 11/09/2012     ID: FAR-2012-0009-0007

Nov 05,2012 11:59 PM ET