The prohibition of Inverted Domestic Corporations should be enforced and continued. Such companies should not be rewarded for tax avoidance collectively in the billions of federal spend. On the other end of the spectrum are responsible US-based small businesses.
A comment was made that small business would not be impacted. On the contrary, look deeper into the issue. How many small businesses manufacture and sell competing products to the federal government? In our specific case, we make ergonomically enhanced, vibration reduced percussive tools for government and industry. One of our competitors, Ingersol Rand, relocated offshore in 2002 for $27,000 on paper and avoided $40 million in taxes. I ask you, should they be rewarded, should their distribution network be rewarded (ie. Grainger, MSC, etc,)
Please ensure you discuss alternate supply chains and please include US based small businesses in the mix.
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-11148
This is comment on Rule
Federal Acquisition Regulations: Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 08/27/2012 ID: FAR-2012-0013-0002
Jul 09,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/27/2012 ID: FAR-2012-0013-0004
Jul 09,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/27/2012 ID: FAR-2012-0013-0005
Jul 09,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/27/2012 ID: FAR-2012-0013-0007
Jul 09,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/27/2012 ID: FAR-2012-0013-0006
Jul 09,2012 11:59 PM ET