Comment #6 on FAR Case 2006-024, Travel Costs

Document ID: FAR-FAR-2007-0001-0192
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Acquisition Regulation
Received Date: February 09 2008, at 11:26 PM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: March 3 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 20 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: February 19 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 803ab7a8
View Document:

This is comment on Proposed Rule

FAR Case 2006-024, Travel Costs

View Comment

I am concerned that this has even become an issue. If the contractors had negotiated travel fees that differ from those of the general public, then the "standard rate" would be that of the contractors. This amendment is nothing more than a waste of time and money. What expertise from the agency is needed here? This is an issue of common sense. If I've missed something because of lack of information I apologize, but from this document alone I see complete disregard for common sense.

Related Comments

View All

Total: 11

Comment #3 on FAR Case 2006-024, Travel Costs
Public Submission Posted: 03/03/2008 ID: FAR-FAR-2007-0001-0189