Matt James McGuire - Comment

Document ID: FDA-2011-D-0464-0006
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Food And Drug Administration
Received Date: August 10 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: September 23 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: June 22 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: September 20 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80edd58b
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Our family lives Type 1 diabetes and its daily struggles. Our youngest is 9 years old and was diagnosed 18 months ago. Like most type 1 diabetics she is the primary, day to day, managers of this chronic condition guided by us, her doctor, and nurse educators. Better smarter tools can help, particularly with high risk severe lows. As the FDA considers low glucose suspend (LGS) I urge you to speed the guidance for approval for such devices for type 1 diabetics who self manage. Children face hormonal issues as they grow that significantly impact and change insulin needs. Their dosing needs can change as rapidly as a few weeks. With the higher insulin sensitivity and more variable insulin needs due to growth, all kids are likely to see a wide variability in blood sugar numbers expressed as A1C. This proposal suggest non inferiority based on glycemic control as quantified by A1C. As you evaluate pediatric use please consider that their glycemic control is a wider range of variability that adults. This higher variability means children may see more and more severe hypos than adults. As a result they are more at risk and are more in need of LGS. Tragically the diabetes community in the US has lost a number of children to hypoglycemia this past year. Please move to rapidly establish guidance for pediatric approval of low glucose suspend that recognizes both the more pressing need to keep children safe and the higher variability in their A1Cs. Low glucose suspend is already approved and available for patients across the world. As you consider guidelines for it, I urge the FDA to look forward and be proactive. The FDA should develop guidelines NOW for the more advanced artificial pancreas. Beyond that the FDA should be preparing guidance for the approval of faster and smarter insulins, better infusion sets, and data processing tools that facilitate better manual and automated glucose management. Regards, Matt McGuire

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 28
Michael W. Hoskins - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 09/23/2011     ID: FDA-2011-D-0464-0004

Sep 20,2011 11:59 PM ET
Matt James McGuire - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 09/23/2011     ID: FDA-2011-D-0464-0006

Sep 20,2011 11:59 PM ET
Kristin Cameron - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 09/23/2011     ID: FDA-2011-D-0464-0007

Sep 20,2011 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 09/23/2011     ID: FDA-2011-D-0464-0008

Sep 20,2011 11:59 PM ET
Jaeb Center for Health Research - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 09/23/2011     ID: FDA-2011-D-0464-0009

Sep 20,2011 11:59 PM ET