This proposal is a great first step towards the mitigation of responsibility that should be found elsewhere, such as homeowners/business insurance. I would have liked to have seen a decremental scale, such as 75% the first occurrence, 50% the second occurrence, 25% the third occurrence, and 0% after that for the life of the building and not just for 10 years, but again this is much better than what we have been doing in the past. If the people want to take a greater risk on living in certain areas then they should accept greater responsibility and the premiums that come with that instead of relying solely on the government.
Comment Submitted by Clinton J. Andersen
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Disaster Assistance; Public Assistance Repetitive Damage
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 08/14/2009 ID: FEMA-2008-0006-0002
Oct 13,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/14/2009 ID: FEMA-2008-0006-0003
Oct 13,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/14/2009 ID: FEMA-2008-0006-0004
Oct 13,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/14/2009 ID: FEMA-2008-0006-0005
Oct 13,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/17/2009 ID: FEMA-2008-0006-0006
Oct 13,2009 11:59 PM ET