Michael Frederick - Comments

Document ID: FHWA-2001-11159-0310
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Highway Administration
Received Date: July 31 2008, at 11:24 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 31 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 31 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: May 21 2002, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 806a3e16
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Part 4 – Pedestrian Signal Warrant: While I support the new warrant, as it is long over due, it does not go far enough. The pedestrian and bicyclist are equal users of a roadway to a motor vehicle and should be treated equally. The warrant should not be separated from any of the other vehicle volume warrant. Pedestrians and cyclist should be counted within the same warrant as motor vehicles and the combination of all intersection “volume” determine if a signal is required. Other jurisdictions outside the US have handled the signal warrant this way for years. Let’s start here and be inclusive.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 9
Anthony Calarossi - Comments
Public Submission    Posted: 01/16/2008     ID: FHWA-2001-11159-0300

May 21,2002 11:59 PM ET
National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices - Comments
Public Submission    Posted: 07/17/2008     ID: FHWA-2001-11159-0305

May 21,2002 11:59 PM ET
National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices - Comments
Public Submission    Posted: 07/21/2008     ID: FHWA-2001-11159-0306

May 21,2002 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous - Comments
Public Submission    Posted: 07/31/2008     ID: FHWA-2001-11159-0307

May 21,2002 11:59 PM ET
Michael Frederick - Comments
Public Submission    Posted: 07/31/2008     ID: FHWA-2001-11159-0308

May 21,2002 11:59 PM ET