I am in support the provisions in MAP-21 concerning CEs for projects in the right-of-way and projects receiving limited federal funds.
Please note:
1) The original MAP-21 wording adequately defines the use of these CEs.
2) The proposed rulemaking limits the original intent of MAP-21.
3) The attempt to redefine the operational right-of-way is restrictive and limits the intent of MAP-21.
4) FHWA should use the language in MAP-21 to define operational right-of-way.
5) The MAP-21 language concerning projects receiving limited federal funds is clear and concise. Do not add the qualification of "projects that do not require Administrative actions other than funding."
Idaho Association of County Engineers and Road Supervisors - Comments
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Environmental Impact and Related Procedures
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 04/04/2013 ID: FHWA-2013-0007-0005
Apr 29,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/01/2013 ID: FHWA-2013-0007-0039
Apr 29,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/01/2013 ID: FHWA-2013-0007-0032
Apr 29,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/29/2013 ID: FHWA-2013-0007-0019
Apr 29,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/01/2013 ID: FHWA-2013-0007-0040
Apr 29,2013 11:59 PM ET