The change in this rule to replace USB type B connectors with USB type A connectors without changing the definition of implementation is confusing according to the USB 2.0 spec.
Type A connectors, according to the USB 2.0 spec implement a host connection which normally interfaces to a Mass Storage class / device". A Host class or Type A connector is not itself a Mass Storage device, nor does it per USB spec emulate a Mass Storage class / device.
If our device is to implement a Type A connector / USB Host, then the DOT official's device should be the USB Mass Storage class device, such as a USB thumbdrive, etc.
Please let me know if I'm mistaken or if there is still going to be a change in the DOT Official's device so that it appears as a USB Mass Storage device. Also, will the DOT official have a thumbdrive or present a cable to the CMV driver?
Your rule states (which is a contradiction to the USB spec):
Appendix A to Part 395—Electronic
On-Board Recorder Performance
Specifications
* * * * *
2.2 Wired. EOBRs must be capable of
transferring RODS using the ‘‘Universal Serial
Bus Specification (Revision 2.0)’’
(incorporated by reference, see § 395.18).
Each EOBR device must implement a single
USB compliant interface featuring a Type A
connector. The USB interface must
implement the Mass Storage class (08h) for
driverless operation.
Carleton Watkins - Comments
This is comment on Rule
Electronic On-Board Recorders for Hours-of-Service Compliance
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 11/18/2010 ID: FMCSA-2004-18940-1172