I wish to comment on DOT Docket No. FMCSA-2008-0292 as submitted by the
Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (Advocates) on November 7, 2008. As you
may know, this document details and argues against the application for exemption
of drivers with some kind of vision impairmment in meeting the federal vision
standards for safe operation of commercial motor carrier vehicles.
As an optometrist with more than 35 years of experience, I concur that in the
case of optometrists or ophthalmologists, their recommendations on whether a
particular individual can operate a vehicle safely enough may not be in their
purview. While I am talented and knowledgeable in the assessment of the level of
vision and may be capable in determining the efficiency of reading for my
patients who may have vision impairment of one kind or another, I would beg or
defer from attesting to the ability of my patient to operate safely a large
commercial vehicle. As mentioned in this document, actual operation of a motor
vehicle is probably not within the realm of most eye care providers unless they
have had specific experience doing so, much like a flight surgeon for pilot
certification.
What eye care providers, whether optometrists or ophthalmologists, can attest is
the potential obstacles of a patient's eye condition and any possible
performance problems deriving from that. However, these performance appraisals
do not necessarily equate to safe operation of a vehicle. Even giving a patient
a clean bill of health only means that there are no vision components that
should prevent a possible problem, but that doesn't necessarily translate to an
ability to read road signs, or react quickly and decisively in a potential
hazardous driving condition.
In recognition of this quandary, I don't believe it serves the public welfare to
have eye care providers to attest to the ability of a driver to operate a motor
vehicle safely. I believe that their value is in addressing the vision
performance of a patient under laboratory conditions which aren't necessarily
relevant or related to actual driving conditions.
Respectfully yours,
Richard Hom O.D.
San Francisco, CA
Related Comments
Total: 5
Anonymous - Comments Public SubmissionPosted: 10/20/2008
ID: FMCSA-2008-0292-0002
Richard Hom - Comments
This is comment on Rule
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 10/20/2008 ID: FMCSA-2008-0292-0002
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/29/2008 ID: FMCSA-2008-0292-0004
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/10/2008 ID: FMCSA-2008-0292-0005
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/12/2008 ID: FMCSA-2008-0292-0007
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/12/2008 ID: FMCSA-2008-0292-0006
Nov 17,2008 11:59 PM ET