Comment on FR Doc # 2012-12685

Document ID: FSA-2012-0008-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Farm Service Agency
Received Date: May 29 2012, at 12:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: May 29 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: May 25 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 24 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8101fdd3
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Microloan Operating Loans

View Comment

I see no reason to remove the LO-Doc section of the regulations as they still serve a purpose for those requests over $35,000 for current borrowers who pay on time and need direct annual operating loan assistance. These may only be a small number in the big picture, but why waste money reprinting handbook pages to remove this program when its already in place and can still be used at no cost in leaving it in the regulations. It makes no sense to remove it at the cost of having to reprint all handbook references to it. Paper costs money and toner isn't cheap. It costs nothing to leave it in place but it does cost to remove it.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 47
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-12685
Public Submission    Posted: 05/29/2012     ID: FSA-2012-0008-0002

Jul 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-12685
Public Submission    Posted: 05/29/2012     ID: FSA-2012-0008-0003

Jul 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-12685
Public Submission    Posted: 06/05/2012     ID: FSA-2012-0008-0004

Jul 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-12685
Public Submission    Posted: 06/05/2012     ID: FSA-2012-0008-0005

Jul 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-12685
Public Submission    Posted: 06/08/2012     ID: FSA-2012-0008-0006

Jul 24,2012 11:59 PM ET