See attached document for full comments.
To Whom It May Concern,
In addition to the Hiawatha National Forest that the National Resources Defense
Council (“NRDC”) suggests to be designated as critical habitat for the Hine’s
Emerald Dragonfly, the Michigan Nature Association (MNA) would like to require
the following three areas also to be designated as critical habitat: The
Lennagene Rossman Stratton Memorial (“The Stratton Memorial”), The Peter
Memorial, and Mystery Valley. Specifically, those three areas of land are
located as follow: T 42N., R4W., Sec. 31 in Brevort Township, Mackinac County; T
31N., R9E., Sec. 4 in Alpena Township, Alpena County; and T 33N., R6E., Sec. 32
in Posen Township, Presque Isle County; respectively. The inclusion of the
Stratton Memorial is especially important because it falls directly under the
argument the NRDC made concerning the addition of private land that lies
adjacent to the Hiawatha National Forest (5). The reasons for designating The
Stratton Memorial are applicable to the other two areas aforementioned; thus,
justifying their designation as critical habitats as well.
The Stratton Memorial, a piece of land that is located near Brevort Lake, MI
falls under many stipulations required by the FWS when a piece of land is
considered for critical habitat. First, it possesses all the necessary PCEs
required to be a critical habitat for the Hine’s Emerald Dragonfly. Some of
these PCEs include imperative geological and hydrological features, such as
water flowing through limestone and tufa rock, which creates habitat for the
federally endangered dragonfly (Emmi and Plater 2004). As delineated in the
Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1532(5)(A)(i), these geological
features mandate that this area of land be designated as critical habitat. It
states that critical habitat is “[the] specific areas within the geographical
area occupied by the species” which contain “physical or biological features (I)
essential to the conservation of species and (II) which may require special
management considerations or protection.”
The reason these natural features mandate designation as critical habitat is
that the primary threat to the Hine’s emerald dragonfly is habitat destruction
(U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service). The specific habitat that the Hine’s Emerald
Dragonfly requires is so delicate that the greatest protection available is
necessary to maintain the fragile components. Any sort of disturbance, which
can range from large urban development to minute contamination due to local
waste, can drastically damage already exiguous habitat area (U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service 2006). This vast range of potentiality demonstrates the vital
necessity for the land to be classified as critical habitat.
One alarming fact to consider is any degree of alteration to channels in the
wetland systems can affect breeding habitat. Wetland systems are especially
important to the life cycle of the Hine’s Emerald Dragonfly because the larvae
require the shallow water to develop and feed (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service).
This fact warrants the designation of the three proposed MNA lands because even
though they may be outside of current considered lands, they all have and
contribute to channels in the dragonfly’s breeding habitat. This is especially
true for the Stratton Memorial, which has numerous channels that directly feed
into the Hiawatha wetland system.
In addition to being required by law, it’s only logical that if available land
has the potential to be designated as critical habitat, that it in fact be
designated and not left unprotected, resulting in potential loss and
endangerment of the dragonfly. These three pieces of land are small enough in
size that no significant cost would be gained, and no possible partnerships or
efforts would be put in jeopardy if these lands were to be designated as
critical habitat. It would only help.
The MNA greatly appreciates and lauds the actions of the Service to reconsider
the designation of the Hiawatha National Forest as a critical habitat. Such a
large area of land protected would provide better security and insurance to the
proliferation and survival of the Hine’s Emerald Dragonfly. Besides the
individual biological and physical merits that The Stratton Memorial possesses,
its adjacent location to the Hiawatha National Forest only further legitimizes
its designation as a critical habitat. In laymen’s terms, The Stratton Memorial
as critical habitat would be like increasing the size of the Hiawatha National
Forest in terms of the dragonfly’s protection. Again, simple logic underlies
the protection of the Hine’s Emerald Dragonfly.
In regards to the previous statement, the NRDC also makes an argument in favor
of designating private land. History has shown that the FWS is not particular
to involving itself with privately owned land(Wetzler and Fallon 2009).
However, MNA and its constituent members would like to state that we fully
support and believe in the designation of our three pieces of land as critical
habitat. We feel that the benefits that will result following the designation
will maintain the lands and show the support of the FWS for the work that we do.
With that being said, the support for private lands being designated accompanied
by the understanding of required biological and physical characteristics needed
for the Hine’s Emerald Dragonfly require the designation of the other two lands
mentioned in the beginning, the Peter Memorial and Mystery Valley. These two
sections of private land are found in Alpena County and Presque Isle,
respectively. Research and fieldwork have shown that the dragonfly does make
its habitat in these two counties in addition to Mackinac County, where Hiawatha
National Forest and The Stratton Memorial are found. These two areas have very
similar biological and physical characteristics that require greater protection
to ensure that the dragonfly’s survival is guaranteed.
It may be argued, like in the original Final Rule, according to 16. U.S.C. §
1533(b)(2), that the costs of designating these two other areas as critical
habitats may outweigh the potential gains, which allows the Secretary to exclude
them, unless their exclusion will result in the extinction of the
creature(Wetzler and Fallon 2009). Based on the provided evidence and factual
information, excluding any land that the Hine’s Emerald Dragonfly may utilize
would certainly place this creature in serious jeopardy.
To summarize, the MNA strongly recommends that the FWS designate The Stratton
Memorial, The Peter Memorial, and Mystery Valley as critical habitat for the
Hine’s Emerald Dragonfly. With habitat loss being the most pressing issue
facing this endangered species, the addition of any more land to the status of
critical habitat greatly reduces the possibility of losing this dragonfly for
good. The circumstances that these lands currently possess make them ideal,
logical, and necessary factors to consider when reevaluating the Final Decision.
Jeremy Emmi
Executive Director Michigan Nature Association
Michael Breish
Michigan Nature Association Statewide Steward
Works Cited
Emmi, Jeremy, and Brent Plater. "Lawsuit to Protect Hine's Emerald Dragonfly
Settles Successfully." Michigan Nature Association Newsletter, October 2004.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. "Hine's Emerald Dragonfly." Threatened and
Endangered Species, March 2006.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "Summary of the Proposal to Designate Critical
Habitat for the Hine's Emerald Dragonfly." Summary of Proposal, Department of
the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2006.
Wetzler, Andrew, and Ph. D., Sylvia Fallon. "Revised Critical Habitat for the
HIne's Emerald Dragonfly." Public Comments Processing. Chicago, Illinois:
Natural Resources Defense Council, June 22, 2009.
Comment on FR Doc # E9-09164
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Revised Critical Habitat for the Hine's Emerald Dragonfly; Revised proposed rule; reopening of public comment period, proposal to designate additional critical habitat unit
View Comment
Attachments:
Comment on FR Doc # E9-09164
Title:
Comment on FR Doc # E9-09164
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 05/07/2009 ID: FWS-R3-ES-2009-0017-0002
Jun 22,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/22/2009 ID: FWS-R3-ES-2009-0017-0003
Jun 22,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/23/2009 ID: FWS-R3-ES-2009-0017-0004
Jun 22,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/23/2009 ID: FWS-R3-ES-2009-0017-0005
Jun 22,2009 11:59 PM ET