I am all for people doing anything they can to help this species, but how do the laws of the ESA protect species that do not naturally grow wild within the USA? It only impacts birds in aviculture, and all it does is create bureaucracy and paperwork for breeding between state lines. If FWS really wanted to help these foreign birds, they would support a breeding registry for owners of these birds to encourage captive breeding & genetic preservation program, but that is more dynamic than the existing permit-based legislation that will mainly only serve to keep populations 'bottlenecked' inside state lines.
Submitted Electronically via eRulemaking Portal
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Listing Blue-throated Macaw
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 01/10/2013 ID: FWS-R9-ES-2012-0034-0007
Mar 11,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/28/2013 ID: FWS-R9-ES-2012-0034-0019
Mar 11,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/28/2013 ID: FWS-R9-ES-2012-0034-0018
Mar 11,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/28/2013 ID: FWS-R9-ES-2012-0034-0011
Mar 11,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/28/2013 ID: FWS-R9-ES-2012-0034-0015
Mar 11,2013 11:59 PM ET