Comment on FR Doc # E8-29018

Document ID: FWS-R9-MB-2008-0109-0004
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Fish And Wildlife Service
Received Date: January 04 2009, at 07:10 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 5 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 8 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: January 22 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8080da4f
View Document:

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Migratory Bird Permits; Revision of Expiration Dates for Double- Crested Cormorant Depredation Orders

View Comment

Regulations such as the double-crested cormorant depredation orders should not have expiration dates. Revising the regulations and doing additional NEPA analyses when the regulations expire add additional expenses for the agency, and could interfere with other needed work. With the limited funding under which the Fish and Wildlife Service operates, the agency should not set arbitrary expiration dates for its regulations.

Related Comments

View All

Total: 17

Comment on FR Doc # E8-29018
Public Submission Posted: 12/11/2008 ID: FWS-R9-MB-2008-0109-0003