Comment on FR Doc # 2010-11032

Document ID: FWS-R9-MB-2010-0040-0033
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Fish And Wildlife Service
Received Date: June 23 2010, at 08:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 28 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: May 13 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: June 25 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80b091c5
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

You are to be commended for considering this zone change... It is my humble opinion that the Wisconsin zones should include a third zone- that being the Mississippi River subzone. The lines are well understood, the hunters have proven to be very conservation minded and it fits all the criteria of your rule making . seeyaonthemarsh-Don

Related Comments

   
Total: 5
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-11032
Public Submission    Posted: 06/28/2010     ID: FWS-R9-MB-2010-0040-0032

Jun 25,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-11032
Public Submission    Posted: 06/28/2010     ID: FWS-R9-MB-2010-0040-0033

Jun 25,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-11032
Public Submission    Posted: 06/28/2010     ID: FWS-R9-MB-2010-0040-0034

Jun 25,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-11032
Public Submission    Posted: 06/28/2010     ID: FWS-R9-MB-2010-0040-0035

Jun 25,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-11032
Public Submission    Posted: 08/09/2010     ID: FWS-R9-MB-2010-0040-0059

Jun 25,2010 11:59 PM ET