If this NPRM does not change the existing rule, why is this rule asking for more money. It seems to imply that a new tax is bing added to the product being tested. If there is a test and cost it should be limited to a specified amount in order to prevent the cost from being an excessive burden on the consumer.
Submitted Electronically via eRulemaking Portal
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Migratory Bird Hunting; Nontoxic Shot for Use in Waterfowl Hunting
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 04/01/2013 ID: FWS-R9-MB-2011-0077-0002
Jun 03,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/14/2013 ID: FWS-R9-MB-2011-0077-0005
Jun 03,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/16/2013 ID: FWS-R9-MB-2011-0077-0003
Jun 03,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/16/2013 ID: FWS-R9-MB-2011-0077-0004
Jun 03,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/30/2013 ID: FWS-R9-MB-2011-0077-0006
Jun 03,2013 11:59 PM ET