Jim Sutter - Comment on FR Doc # 2011-17994

Document ID: GIPSA-2011-FGIS-0001-RULEMAKING-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Grain Inspection, Packers And Stockyards Administration
Received Date: September 13 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: September 13 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 18 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: September 16 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f17d63
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Since the advent of shipping bulk loaded US soy in containers, the US soy industry has implemented programs and activities promoting the growth of this logistics channel. US soybean producers chose to invest both national soybean check-off resources as well as US Department of Agriculture export development funds to promote container logistics based upon the positive benefits that importers identified when purchasing US soy in containers. Specifically, these benefits are: 1. Soybeans delivered in containers originate very close to the source of production which allows the US soybean industry to offer importers a differentiated soybean in the global market place at or near the prevailing delivered commodity soybean cost. 2. Increased flexibility in terms of purchasing volumes and delivery schedules of US soy. USSEC is membership organization that implements international market development activities on behalf of US soybean producers and exporters. With this role and mission, USSEC’s members contend all advantages to differentiate US soy in the global market need to be maintained and sustained. Bulk loading and delivery of US soy in containers is a clear example of an advantage that differentiates US soy in the global market place and to that end USSEC questions regulations that would detrimentally impact the competitiveness of this logistics channel.

Attachments:

Sutter Containerized Soy Proposed GIPSA New Rules Letter

Title:
Sutter Containerized Soy Proposed GIPSA New Rules Letter

View Attachment: View as format msw8 View as format pdf

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 7
Christopher James Bradley - Comment on FR Doc # 2011-17994
Public Submission    Posted: 09/13/2011     ID: GIPSA-2011-FGIS-0001-RULEMAKING-0002

Sep 16,2011 11:59 PM ET
Jim Sutter - Comment on FR Doc # 2011-17994
Public Submission    Posted: 09/13/2011     ID: GIPSA-2011-FGIS-0001-RULEMAKING-0003

Sep 16,2011 11:59 PM ET
James A Reed - Comment on FR Doc #2011-17994
Public Submission    Posted: 09/13/2011     ID: GIPSA-2011-FGIS-0001-RULEMAKING-0004

Sep 16,2011 11:59 PM ET
Bo DeLong - Comment on FR Doc #2011-17994
Public Submission    Posted: 09/13/2011     ID: GIPSA-2011-FGIS-0001-RULEMAKING-0005

Sep 16,2011 11:59 PM ET
Jess McCluer - Comment on FR Doc # 2011-17994
Public Submission    Posted: 09/26/2011     ID: GIPSA-2011-FGIS-0001-RULEMAKING-0006

Sep 16,2011 11:59 PM ET