Comment on FR Doc # E9-26203

Document ID: HHS-OCR-2009-0020-0002
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Department Of Health And Human Services
Received Date: November 02 2009, at 07:40 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: November 3 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 30 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 29 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80a4f5b0
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

There is nothing in this rule that clarifies how or when it might apply to attorneys representing covered entities in litigation. As a result, it creates a chilling effect and interferes with the representation. If there are going to be monetary penalties up to $50k for unintentional violations, there should be an exception for lawful discovery, including exchanging copies of records with other parties in discovery, inadvertent disclosure during discovery, and other issues. At the very least, there should be an exception if the disclosure is made based on a good-faith belief in interpretation of the rule and its relation to state law, as many states still have not determined the scope of the Privacy Rule as it relates to lawful civil discovery.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 23
Comment on FR Doc # E9-26203
Public Submission    Posted: 11/03/2009     ID: HHS-OCR-2009-0020-0002

Dec 29,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-26203
Public Submission    Posted: 01/04/2010     ID: HHS-OCR-2009-0020-0003

Dec 29,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-26203
Public Submission    Posted: 01/04/2010     ID: HHS-OCR-2009-0020-0004

Dec 29,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-26203
Public Submission    Posted: 01/04/2010     ID: HHS-OCR-2009-0020-0005

Dec 29,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-26203
Public Submission    Posted: 01/04/2010     ID: HHS-OCR-2009-0020-0006

Dec 29,2009 11:59 PM ET